The Member awards judge will support the ÌÇÐĹÙÍø Member event awards by reviewing nominations and contributing to fair, transparent and values driven decisions that celebrate excellence within ÌÇÐĹÙÍø's membership.

Key responsibilities

  • review and assess nominations: evaluate submitted nominations against the published criteria, ensuring consistency and impartiality
  • apply judging criteria: use the agreed scoring framework to assess entries objectively, considering impact, innovation and alignment with ÌÇÐĹÙÍø values
  • participate in judging discussions: attend virtual or in-person judging meetings to discuss shortlisted candidates and contribute to final decisions
  • maintain confidentiality: handle all nomination information securely and confidentially throughout the process and be willing to sign a contract containing a confidentiality clause to ensure confidentiality until the award winners are announced
  • champion fairness and diversity: ensure decisions reflect inclusivity and fairness, recognising contributions from diverse backgrounds and contexts

Skills and attributes

  • strong analytical and decision-making skills
  • ability to remain impartial and objective
  • commitment to ÌÇÐĹÙÍø’s values and ethical principles
  • excellent communication and collaboration skills
  • confident in using software and technology to review nominations
  • a ÌÇÐĹÙÍø registered member, accredited or senior accredited member

Eligibility criteria

  • must be a current ÌÇÐĹÙÍø member with registered, accredited or senior accredited status
  • no conflicts of interest with nominees or award categories
  • willingness to commit time and uphold confidentiality

Benefits for judges

  • opportunity to contribute to recognising excellence within the profession
  • professional development through exposure to innovative practices and achievements
  • networking with peers and sector leaders
  • recognition in ÌÇÐĹÙÍø communications as part of the judging panel and personal invitation to the awards evening held in October 2026

Time commitment

  • reviewing nominations: approximately four to six hours over a two to three week period
  • attending a judging meeting: one to two hours (virtual or in-person)